- Last Updated on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 15:44
- Published on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 15:44
- Hits: 657
Richard Nixon is a ghost most Republicans, those that even remember him (and a few, like me, who remember him fondly), would like to forget. But, say what you will about him, he knew a lot about running for President. No other person, with the exception of FDR, has been on a national ballot as many times as Nixon. That’s why, long after he resigned, GOP nominees regularly sought out his advice. Even Democrat George McGovern, who lost to Nixon in 1972, while considering another run for President in 1976 talked to his former adversary about his prospects. Nixon had a lot of advice, but to prospective party nominees, it was simple, “run to the right to get the nomination, secure your base, and then run to the middle in the general election.” Nixon died almost twenty years ago, but his candid advice, still carries weight.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 03 October 2012 00:52
- Published on Wednesday, 03 October 2012 00:52
- Hits: 641
Mitt Romney’s campaign is in trouble. The polls, nationwide, but especially in the swing states, are moving slowly, but steadily in the President’s direction. Just a month ago it seemed like Mitt Romney’s election to lose and now that seems to be what he is doing. Remarkably, for a man who has been centered and focused in all he has done in his life the Republican candidate seems lost. However, there is still a month to go in this campaign and a lot can happen. History has proven that. Having said that, I am not going to offer the GOP candidate any advice, instead, I asked a number of people, several strong Romney supporters, some hardcore Democrats, and at least one person who isn’t sure how they’re going to vote, what advice they would personally give Mitt Romney. Just as if they were on the phone talking to him.
- Last Updated on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 20:16
- Published on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 20:16
- Hits: 756
For the Democrats 2008 was one of the most exciting campaigns in the party’s history. Their candidate was the first African American to lead a national ticket and his popularity and his oratory were the stuff that made the political juices flow. The enthusiasm that then-Senator Obama could generate was hard to match. Local Democratic chairs were awash with volunteers wanting to help Obama. It got to the point that at my local headquarters volunteers using their own cell phones had to sit on the front steps of the headquarters offices, or out in their cars, in order to make calls to prospective voters. There simply wasn’t enough room inside.
- Last Updated on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 20:48
- Published on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 20:48
- Hits: 547
It’s called Sequestration. You’ve seen the term in dozens of articles. It’s been talked about on Fox, CNN, and all the other major news organizations. But, what, exactly, does sequestration mean, and a fair question, “why should I care?” It sounds like just another invented government word that only someone in the Washington establishment is likely to understand. Normally, I would say, yes, that’s about it, but in this case, sequestration has the potential of substantially impacting government operations. And this could include spending and jobs in our area.
Sequestration, strangely enough, is not a new term. It was first used in a long forgotten budget cutting bill enacted in the 1980’s called “Gramm Rudman Hollings.” This legislation was created to deal with what was then considered an astronomical deficit of $2 Trillion. What it did was to apply cuts to existing programs across the board. Alas, it wasn’t that effective a tool. Congress, and President Reagan were enacting bigger and bigger budgets and sequestration, which was much smaller than the increases, just couldn’t keep up.
- Last Updated on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 19:55
- Published on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 19:55
- Hits: 602
There is, or at least there was, an old rule of thumb when it came to national politics. It wasn’t particularly formal, but I heard it repeated enough, and saw it validated enough, that it seemed like a pretty good generalization. The rule dealt with the size and loyalty of the Democratic and Republican base. Namely, that roughly 35% of the voters can be guaranteed to support one party while another 35%, give or take, will support the other party. That took care of about 70% of the voters. However, the remainder, roughly 30%, though some might lean one way or the other, were the independents, and were the votes both parties fought for during the general election.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 05 September 2012 15:07
- Published on Wednesday, 05 September 2012 15:07
- Hits: 781
Of all the hundreds of TV advertisements that will run this fall it’s estimated that more than 80% of them will be negative. Of course, there is nothing new in negative campaigning. Each election cycle, we carry on as if it’s a new horror of the American political system, but it’s not. Negative campaigning has been around since the beginning of the republic. They didn’t have television or radio back then, but ask Thomas Jefferson or Abraham Lincoln about negative campaigns, then, in the form of fliers, and editorials, and they will know exactly what you’re talking about.