- Last Updated on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 19:29
- Published on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 19:29
- Hits: 347
Candidates for governor almost never have any choice in the makeup of the ticket. The candidates for lieutenant governor and attorney general all run separate campaigns. This means a candidate for governor could find himself paired with running mates who may or may not share his philosophy -- 2005 was a good example.
Tim Kaine was carefully cultivating his moderate positions in his run against Jerry Kilgore. However, the Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor, Leslie Byrne, had beaten moderate Chap Peterson in the primary and was campaigning to the left of Kaine. It’s possible, though he never said so, that Kaine would have preferred Peterson. Byrne’s liberal views sometimes made it hard for Kaine to look as moderate as he wanted. However, as it turned out, Kaine won the election and Byrne came surprisingly close to winning. But they were definitely two different kinds of candidates, and the match wasn’t an easy one.
This year it’s possible that the down-ticket candidates, while running in the shadows, may have more of an impact on the general election than usual. This is particularly true for GOP candidate for governor, Bob McDonnell.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 17 June 2009 16:26
- Published on Wednesday, 17 June 2009 16:26
- Hits: 330
By David S. Kerr
At several points during the recent campaign for the femocratic nomination for governor, State Senator Creigh Deeds was all but written off. Some suggested it might be best if he dropped out. Others thought maybe it would be better if he ran for attorney general again instead. But Deeds, who had been running for governor for most of the past four years, would have none of that. He was in this race to the end. And what’s more, while others ignored him and assumed he would come in a distant third, he saw a different ending to this campaign. He thought he was going to win and based on last week's results it looks like he was right.
There were three candidates in this primary: Terry McAuliffe, a Clinton intimate; Brian Moran, a popular former delegate from Alexandria; and Deeds. McAuliffe had money and Moran had connections and a good organization. They were both vigorous campaigners. Until the very end, it looked one of those two was on his way to the nomination. But something happened on the way to the polling booth. McAuliffe, figuring Moran was his principal adversary, and reasonably assured he was fighting for the party’s liberal base, kept pushing Moran on liberal issues. The exchange got heated and Moran, by necessity, had to do his best to “out liberal” McAuliffe.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 03 June 2009 17:59
- Published on Wednesday, 03 June 2009 17:59
- Hits: 280
Nationally the Republican Party is suffering from what a marketing professional would call a crisis in brand management.
In other words, they have let their GOP identity, its label if you will, get hijacked by people who don’t necessarily represent the interest or concerns of the majority of Republican voters. At the very least, they aren’t personalities that are likely to help the party get back into power, either in 2010 or 2012.
Right now, in a bizarre twist, the primary GOP spokesmen are radio personality, Rush Limbaugh, and the ex-vice President, Dick Cheney. Each of them seems to basking in the attention, but in terms of helping their party regain its momentum, they’re both causing more harm than they are helping.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 17:48
- Published on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 17:48
- Hits: 306
It was the closest statewide election in the history of the Commonwealth and if Creigh Deeds, the Democratic candidate for Attorney General in 2005, had managed to garner just a few hundred more votes everything about this year’s election would be different.
More than likely, in the tradition of these contests, winning that election would have made Deeds the heir apparent for the Democratic nod to run for Governor. However, that’s not the way it worked out. Bob McDonnell won that election and now he is the GOP standard bearer in the race for Governor. As for the Democrats, they’re fighting it out in a primary. Oh what a difference a few hundred votes can make.
This year Creigh Deeds, the loser in that cliff hanger election in 2005, is one of the Democrats trying to get their party’s nomination for Governor. His only opponent, that is up until late last year, was Delegate Brian Moran from Alexandria. For the most part, it looked like Moran had the edge. Moran had more money, deep ties in vote rich Northern Virginia and a better organization. However, that simple dynamic got tossed on its ear when Terry McAuliffe entered the race. All at once it was a three person contest. Moran and Deeds were known quantities, but now, with McAuliffe in the race, and he is anything but a known quantity, it’s become a far more complicated picture.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 18:59
- Published on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 18:59
- Hits: 250
Virginia Republicans won’t be voting in the June Democratic Primary. They have already made their choice and that’s Bob McDonnell. Surprisingly, at least so far, the Virginia GOP and its candidates haven’t offered much commentary on the Democratic nomination battle. They’re staying out of it. However, if you were to ask the average Republican activist who they think would be the perfect opponent in November, the one that’s easiest to beat, the answer would probably be Terry McAuliffe.
The Democratic nomination, which will be decided on June 9, is intensely competitive. However, the dynamics have shifted considerably over what many expected just a year ago. For most of the past four years the assumption was that the nomination battle would be between former Delegate Brian Moran of Alexandria and State Senator Creigh Deeds of Bath.
The betting was heavily leaning towards Moran. Senator Deeds is a highly accomplished State Senator with a moderate record. However, Moran, with his high name recognition, experience as caucus chairman, and deep ties in Northern Virginia was given the edge. But, this simple match up was turned upside down late last year when Terry McAuliffe entered the race. No one, and this is still the case, knows quite what to make of him or his prospect for winning the primary.
Terry McAuliffe, unlike his two opponents, is a noted national figure. He was chairman of the Democratic National Committee from 2001 to 2005, and before that, he was a close associate of Bill and Hillary Clinton. And that’s still a tie, as witnessed by President Bill Clinton’s campaign swing through Virginia for McAuliffe, that’s still very strong.
McAuliffe, most recently, ran Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2008. McAuliffe has also amassed a large personal fortune and through years being one of the Democratic Party’s most successful fund-raisers, has ties to donors all over the country. He quickly put this background to work and is already vastly outspending his two opponents. He has staff, offices all over the state, and a large media budget. Say what you will about him, he doesn’t take on something half way.
McAuliffe’s resume is impressive, but there is one glaring gap in his CV and that’s his background in Virginia politics. He has none. He has never been involved in local or state politics and has never held elected office. In many respects he is the ultimate carpetbagger. And while that term may sound harsh, make no mistake come the November election, his lack of experience in Virginia politics is going to be an issue.
Then there is the matter of the Clintons. Virginia may have turned blue during the last election, but it has never been friendly territory for Bill or Hillary Clinton. Even the Democrats aren’t that warm towards the former first couple. President Bill Clinton lost the state in both the 1992 and 1996 elections and Hillary lost last year’s Presidential Primary to Barack Obama in a landslide. Virginia Republicans, for their part, know that any candidate associated with the Clintons will only help galvanize their party’s conservative base.
A McAuliffe win will also fit ideally into Republican nominee Bob McDonnell’s overall strategy. He knows that to win, particularly in Northern Virginia he needs to cast himself as a moderate. It’s not an easy task. Bob McDonnell is not a moderate, he is a conservative. But the former Attorney General’s task will be a lot easier if he can paint his Democratic opponent with a far left brush. Or at least far left enough that it makes moderate voters, the kinds the Democrats need to win over, uncomfortable. Thanks to the Clinton label this is going to be a lot easier than it would be with another Democrat.
While some Democrats may be convinced that Virginia, thanks to their impressive victory in 2008, has suddenly become a hotbed of liberalism, this is probably wishful thinking. Historically, Democratic successes in Northern Virginia have come, thanks to moderates. This is especially true of the now lightly blue outer suburbs of Loudon and Prince William. Tim Kaine, Jim Webb and Mark Warner all appealed to moderate middle class voters.
McAuliffe is a vigorous and determined candidate. He is trying to win over the Democratic Party’s liberal base while at the same time attempting to convince those a bit more skeptical that his fund raising prowess and national connections will be more than a match for the Republicans in November. This is a good strategy, but also one that shows a lack of understanding of what it takes to win in Virginia.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 19:32
- Published on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 19:32
- Hits: 237
Business Appreciation Week celebrates businesses of all kinds: large businesses, medium sized businesses, and small business. But it’s the small businesses that I think deserve a special recognition. The big businesses, and most of the medium sized ones, have enough capital, enough of a cushion, and of course the political clout, that though things are tough for them, they will probably weather economic storm.
However, small businesses are entirely different.
Their margins, the difference between having enough revenue, being able to make a payroll, and alternatively, not being able to pay the bills, is often surprisingly thin. And yet, small business keeps going. Even in tough economic times, individuals, partnerships, and small stock companies, fight the odds. Rather amazingly, even in tough times, entrepreneurs, people with an idea, a skill, or some special service, keep starting up businesses.
In America over half of the private sector workforce is employed by small business. But, here is a statistic that may really surprise you. According to the U.S. Small Business Administration as much as 75% of the high tech workforce is employed by a small business. Much of this is in information technology, but also includes small research firms and small scale high tech manufacturing. Companies like this, often with just a few employees aren’t at all uncommon in the Northern Neck.
Also, small businesses have a different footprint as opposed to larger scale enterprises. Over half are based at home. However, this is often a little more than running the family business out of the garage. Many consulting companies, not having the resources for a brick and mortar office, have begun to rely on “virtual” internet-based work structures. Of course, a host of small companies, particularly in construction and services, have been home-based for years.
Unfortunately, small businesses, whether it’s one of the many retail sales outlets in this area, or our many service and consulting companies, don’t have the margins that larger businesses have. What this means, is that when things get tight, they don’t have much to fall back on. Unlike the big banks, or the major car companies, no one is stepping in with billions of dollars in credit to keep them from failing.
Sometimes, the margins are awfully thin. A restaurant owner I was talking to last week was delighted that at last there was good weather and he had a weekend where business was strong. However, he said that it was getting so tight, that if he didn’t see a sustained increase in business he was going to have to start laying off waitresses and kitchen staff.
One of the sad realities for small business is that for the most part you’re on your own. And you face a host of obstacles. Just starting a small business can be a trial in itself. Sometimes it seems like the whole structure of government is operating with the goal of keeping you from getting started.
Employment rules are complex. Taxes and social security can be a bookkeeping nightmare. Rules and regulations, both state and federal all requiring this filing, or that impact statement, seem to come at you from all sides, and usually, for most small businesses, the owner is the one who has to cope with it all. Given all the taxes and governmental requirements it’s amazing that small business people ever find time to market their services and satisfy clients. But amazingly, in spite of all the requirements and all the challenges, small business remains the foundation of our American economy.
When our country was founded we were almost entirely a nation of small business owners. Usually, they were what we would today call single proprietorships. Men and women provided products, often hand crafted, as well as services, to a mostly rural economy. It was their spirit of independence and self reliance that fueled the American Revolution.
However, as our economy became more complex, businesses got larger, and so did government. The structure of our economy changed, but small business, from retail, to services, to restaurants, repair shops, and a host of enterprises too numerous to have any hope of naming in this space, thrived as well. Today, small business is under tremendous pressure. They are the first to feel the stress of a bad economy. But, amazingly, often on a month to month basis, they’re hanging in there. Surviving and providing, as they always have the very backbone of the American economy.
By David Kerr