- Last Updated on Wednesday, 17 March 2010 05:00
- Published on Wednesday, 17 March 2010 05:00
- Hits: 397
A lady in King George acquired this pair of glazed pots from a Masonic Lodge in Maine where they had been stored there for many years. They bear no identifying marks, and are in pristine condition. They are 9 1/2 inches tall and 13 inches wide.
These pots, more properly "cachepots", most likely originated at a pottery in Ohio. From the shape and color, dark on tan, they appear to date from the 1920s. Ohio had many glass and pottery factories, which put out great quantities of wares. Items such as these were the rage in the inter-war years and into the 1950s. I can recall similar pieces from childhood at our family home in Colonial Beach.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 05:00
- Published on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 05:00
- Hits: 518
At a recent estate sale that our firm conducted, one of the customers came with several pieces of her china tea service, which she asked me to examine. Although I saw only a few of the pieces it consists of five cups and saucers, five scone plates, a tray, and a set of a lidded sugar and creamer on their own tray. The surfaces bear hand-painted decoration of birds and flowers. She has since sent this photograph via e-mail with a description.
Most importantly, the bottom hallmark bears the inscription that the pieces were made by "Paragon Fine China to commemorate the Birth of the Princess Margaret Rose, Aug. 21, 1930. England." Princess Margaret (1930 – 2002) was the younger sister of the present Queen, the daughter of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth, who were Duke and Duchess of York at the time of her birth. She was a popular figure in Britain, and ironically died three days after the fiftieth anniversary of her father's death, and less than two months before her mother's.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 03 March 2010 05:00
- Published on Wednesday, 03 March 2010 05:00
- Hits: 419
A local gentleman recently purchased this lady's work table. The mahogany veneer was in poor condition, and the piece has been refinished, with the missing veneer having been replaced. The secondary wood is yellow pine. He thinks the hardware are replacements, but the casters are original.
This work table dates from the mid-19th century, between 1840 and 1860. As readers are aware, I usually recommend not refinishing antique furniture, but in this instance, with the need to replace missing veneer, refinishing does not have such a negative effect. I say that because most individuals would not like having a piece of furniture with chunks of missing veneer in their homes. In time the sheen of the new finish will dull down and not be so obvious.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 05:00
- Published on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 05:00
- Hits: 376
A couple from the Middle Peninsula purchased this writing table/desk at an antiques auction in New England. The wood is mahogany and the finish is original. Closed, it appears to be a simple desk; opened, it expands to a large writing surface, perhaps suitable for a lawyer’s conference with clients. They questioned whether it could be a dining table.
Without seeing the piece, I suspect that this is an early 20th-century amalgamation of several motifs, designed primarily for a lawyer’s office. It is unusual, but also basically impractical. The cabinet part is too small for the average office worker, be the party an attorney or not, and at the same time the writing surface, although sufficient for a large conference, when opened, makes the use of the cabinet almost impossible.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 05:00
- Published on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 05:00
- Hits: 339
A family in Poquoson inherited these five English dining chairs, which they brought with them from the Mother Country to Virginia. The condition is not good, and they need substantial refurbishment. The family writes that they are weighing the cost of restoration versus the possibility of selling the chairs.
These are Mid-Victorian English chairs, which undoubtedly are survivors of a larger suite that included at least three and possibly seven other chairs and a great extension table. They date from the 1840s or 1850s, and have as their greatest attribute the fine carving on the front legs.
The cost of restoration will be significant. As readers are aware, I do not recommend refinishing in most instances, but here the chairs’ appearance makes an exception. I doubt that the present finish could be saved sufficiently to make the chairs acceptable in most dining rooms. Obviously, the upholstery calls for replacement. In all, one could spend $300 per chair in a heartbeat.